Covid: the Challenge was Distribution; says Jonathan Couey, Ph,D.
Nanotech+ Propaganda was the real breakthrough
I would greatly appreciate input from bench scientists here as to the credibility of Couey’s conclusions. If he is right, that changes the argument. Thank you!
If I correctly understand Jonathan Couey, Ph.D., while current technology can produce vast quantities of engineered clones, it is simply not possible to create a pandemic using such clones, from a lab leak or even from a planned release. Couey, with 20 years lab experience, most recently at the U. of Pittsburg School of Medicine, notes that the intrinsic poor fidelity of mRNA viruses’ reproduction capability means that, once released, people within a relatively circumscribed radius could be infected and get very sick, but the mRNA virions produce so many defective offspring and so few intact complete viruses in successive generations, that very soon its “epidemic” will diminish. mRNA viruses do not possess the cellular machinery to prevent overwhelming, cumulative errors in successive generations. Certainly, the offspring of virions from one person infected by a lab leak or even a planned release could not cause, by itself, a pandemic. Defective fragments of the original mRNA clones might be capable of producing a variety of milder symptoms, however, over a larger radius.
I hope scientists will challenge Couey’s observations and perhaps disprove or modify his conclusions. If he is correct, that explains the large array of symptoms associated with SARS-Cov-2 infections, ranging from death and hypoxia to brain fog to gastric distress to simple anxiety—not usual for a single illness. Might the circumscribed geographical spread and abeyance of Ebola outbreaks, SARS-Cov-1, MERS, and 2022 Monkeypox suggest a similarly limited lab release?
The difference between the older epidemics and SARS-Cov-2, could be the vast prowess of current propaganda manipulation. Yes, an almost unimaginably elaborate scheme would have been needed to release identical clones at multiple sensitive points all over the planet and then supercharge fear.
Yet consider the scale of planning that might have been needed for such events as, say, a public assassination of a president, a demolition of several skyscrapers or of giant undersea pipelines. Consider also the magnitude of the post pandemic societal changes. Perhaps all that effort might have been worth it.
If the above is true we may, perhaps, need to worry less about a near-future more lethal pandemic, other than a future pandemic of fear. Rather, we might focus even more intensely on how to heal the mass formation, as described by Mattias Desmet, set into motion by current and possible future events which might have been engineered in various ways
Please also see my recent post here:
I now understand the Covid Pandemic
Replying to SAM HUSSEINI: SUBSTACK Did you edit your initial reply? I could swear that when I read this last night you mentioned Robert F. Garry and Kristian Anderson as part of the Kenema lab, and also mentioned that the Kenema lab had lost its US funding at the time of the Sierra Leone/Guinea Ebola outbreak. I am going to go ahead on the premise that…
Have you seen Couey's interview with Peter McCullough? The latter seems to firmly believe in the lab-leak-and-ensuing-variants story - I wonder how JJ will process that...
I have sent the Couey first dialogue with Paul Alexander (which is one of his best expositions of the distribution hypothesis still findable) to one of my old (1980's) fellow-PhD students who is still a virologist, asking him for a critique. However, I won't hold my breath, as this person already thought I was going down "rabbitholes" when I sent him, at various times, stuff about ivermectin, Vera Sharav's documentary, and the Australian doctors (AMPS) speaking out. I wonder whether I will get a "debunk" or just be ignored...